Thanks for publicizing this, Nancy. Caught the interview and it is well worth a listen.
In my experience, most local and/or traditional knowledge tends to get validated when it
gets subjected to rigorous scientific scrutiny. Local folks have the most comprehensive
knowledge of their circumstances and it’s normal to look for plausible explanations.
The unforgiving real world imposes a need to be objectively critical and another need to
gather lessons as they get delivered and to put them together. The local/traditional
explanations don’t always match what conventional science (if it’s lucky!) discovers,
but more often than not, comes pretty close. It’s prudent to be very cautious before
dismissing perceived truths as superstitions. Where did they come from and why?
The Mi’kmaq concept of two-eyed seeing (“To see from one eye with the strengths of
Indigenous ways of knowing, and to see from the other eye with the strengths of Western
ways of knowing, and to use both of these eyes togetherâ€) makes enormous sense, but
needs to be both appreciated as a universal truth and extended.
Fisheries managers these days, for instance, finally get it. If you ignore the wisdom and
knowledge of local fishers (who, by the way, have the biggest stake in sustainable
management), you are almost certain to make serious mistakes. Ditto if they aren’t
involved in management decisions. Yup, besides sustainability, there are some other
ethical questions at play. …
Thirty-five years ago, I was working directly with rice farmers in Northeast Thailand,
testing the viability of rice-fish culture in their fields. Our field staff officer told
us the farmers would always know best, but would respect our knowledge. I asked him what
the best way of giving advice was.
He said, “By asking questions.â€
A year later, one farmer was hauling out 1 Kg. common carp while his neighbours were
catching fish about a tenth the weight.
He asked me, “Why are my fish so big?†(I’m translating!)
I said, “Your field is big and holds water well. Also, your stocking density is
low.â€
He said, “Nope. I have neighbours who stocked the same way and got smaller fish. But my
water’s saline.â€
He was right; his salinity was barely measurable, in contrast to that of other fields.
Fish physiologists will see that his explanation makes sense.
This from a rice farmer in NE Thailand with a good brain and four years of formal
schooling.
But I digress!
From: N Robinson [mailto:nrobbyn@gmail.com]
Sent: May 2, 2021 10:40 AM
To: Mary Macaulay
Cc: naturens(a)chebucto.ca
Subject: [Naturens] Re: Orchestes is out and about
An important book will be published Tuesday: Suzanne Simard from UBC is the author of
Finding the Mother Tree. She has studied the interconnectedness of trees, how they help
each other through the underground fungal network, and the importance not only of
DIVERSITY, but of the MOTHER TREE, hence backing up our pleas to retain old growth and
especially older trees, with scientific evidence.
Dr. Simard was interviewed on Quirks and Quarks yesterday.
Of course this research has been around for a while and nothing has changed. Perhaps this
book will make a difference if we "propagate" it.
There is a good article here:
https://www.the-scientist.com/reading-frames/book-excerpt-from-finding-the-…
Excerpt:
".... The trees soon revealed startling secrets. I discovered that they are in a web
of interdependence, linked by a system of underground channels, where they perceive and
connect and relate with an ancient intricacy and wisdom that can no longer be denied. I
conducted hundreds of experiments, with one discovery leading to the next, and through
this quest I uncovered the lessons of tree-to-tree communication, of the relationships
that create a forest society. The evidence was at first highly controversial, but the
science is now known to be rigorous, peer-reviewed, and widely published. It is no fairy
tale, no flight of fancy, no magical unicorn, and no fiction in a Hollywood movie. "
I have ordered my copy! Paperback will be out in June.
Nancy
On Sun, May 2, 2021 at 8:57 AM Mary Macaulay <marymacaulay(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
I have been visiting as many sites as I can on the "harvest" map before
comments close (locked down now unfortunately). The most recent had a humongous healthy
Old Growth beech on it and lots of smaller ones. It is scheduled to be clearcut (10%
retention). I have been told time and again by L&F and conservation officials that
there is no interest in beech conservation when I draw extremely rare healthy beech in
condemned stands to their attention.
With kindest regards
Mary
On May 2, 2021, at 8:48 AM, Peter Payzant <peter(a)payzant.net> wrote:
 To clarify, I was wondering if there was any point in trying to re-establish Beech
here once the existing ones are gone. When would it be worth the effort, if ever?
It seems that the National Tree Seed Centre is not well-stocked with American Beech seed,
by the way.
--- Peter Payzant
On 2021-05-01 4:37 PM, John and Nhung wrote:
I wonder if the National Tree Seed Centre in Fredericton
(
https://www.nrcan.gc.ca/science-data/research-centres-labs/forestry-researc…)
could help. A couple of years ago, I was in touch re. Hemlocks (threatened by the
adelgid) and black ash (Thought I’d hit a lot of them down here in God’s country, but
they turned out to be a European species!).
Donnie McPhee (donnie.mcphee(a)canada.ca) is the go-to guy and can probably identify go-to
people in N.S.
_______________________________________________
Naturens mailing list -- naturens(a)chebucto.ns.ca
To unsubscribe send an email to naturens-leave(a)chebucto.ns.ca
_______________________________________________
Naturens mailing list -- naturens(a)chebucto.ns.ca
To unsubscribe send an email to naturens-leave(a)chebucto.ns.ca