So well thought through, Pete. Thank you.
I had just come to the computer to say that Jim and I are about to leave town until the
new year (we are probably the two folks that Pete refers to?) so we won’t be able to join
the protest if it happens.
Happy holidays all.
Xox
Jane
On Nov 29, 2021, at 4:23 PM, lavellcampbell
<plavell(a)gmail.com> wrote:
?
All things considered: I am not sure that an attempt at a demonstration at this time is
the right course of action. First and foremost, I do not see a large number of people
committing themselves to it. I count 7, of whom, 2 may not even be in town on the date.
Even if all of the remaining 5 were to show up, one has to admit that it is not much of a
showing. I think that a poor showing is worse than not doing it at all from a public
relations standpoint.
I also think that there is a lot of baggage being attached to this issue. Many of the
people in this neighbourhood and on this mailing list have spent the last 30 or so years
trying to exercise their democratic right to effective input at city hall. In fact, in
those 30 or so years we have not only suffered repeated failures in our attempts to
participate, we have seen the erosion of our ability to participate at all. In my opinion,
in a general sense, the enormous outrage that we are feeling relative to dangerous and
unsightly premises at the Bloomfield site is partially an expression of our growing
realization of and concern about that loss of democracy.
In a particular sense, the Bloomfield site resonates with us. It borders our
community. Neighbours involved in the Imagine Bloomfield initiative worked for years to
establish a development on the site that would have provided affordable housing as well as
other real amenities. They would also have had some claim to participation “by the
people”. It was torpedoed by all levels of government. Now the continued lack of proper
maintenance at the site is particularly galling.
All of this baggage is different from “Dangerous and Unsightly Premises” which was
the starting point of all of this. It has been noted that the city (or someone) seems to
have started at least a partial cleanup at the site. This alone would give them ammunition
in the countering of any claims we might make to the media. In the meanwhile, we might
follow Ron’s example: head up to the site, notice the things that have not been dealt
with, call 311 and register a complaint. Some people have already done so. I complained on
November 18. That reference number is 7750214. The items in my complaint were: broken
windows, graffiti, garbage, lack of proper fencing and poorly maintained, overgrown green
spaces. At least 3 other people have written letters to Lindell and staff. If you call to
complain, have the civic numbers on hand because the complaints are registered under the
civic numbers.
In the meanwhile, I haven’t seen any extra names being added to the 7 people who
initially said they would participate.
Pete